|
Possible use of Superparamagnetic Iron Particle as MR Contrast Agent in Intracranial Tumors
Várallyay Péter 1, Bagó Attila 1, Edward A. Neuwelt 2
1. National Institute of Neurosurgery, Budapest, Hungary 2. Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA
Background
Response to external field
- Ferromagnetic - Fe, Co
very large induced magnetization - residual strength
- Superparamagnetic - iron oxide particle
large induced magnetization - soon loses strength
- Paramagnetic - Gd-ion, Mn, Al, deoxi-Hb
Small induced magnetization - no residual strength
- Diamagnetic - Zn, Au, water, most organic compound, oxi-Hb
Very weak magnetization opposes the external field
Gd-DTPA
- Strong paramagnetic
- 7 unpaired electron/atom
- Electron magnetic field 650x > proton
- Shorten T1 and T2
- Enhancement on T1 sequences
Magnevist TM, Omniscan TM
- Diffusion - fast extracellular distribution
- Plasma half-life ~70 min
- Enhancement is seen ~45 min
- 0.1 mmol/Kg
- almost complete renal elimination < 24 h
Gd-DTPA enhancement

IUSPO
Ability of changing the signal intensity (Relaxivity; R)
Iron oxide particles >> Gd DTPA - R1 5x - R2 10-20x
Intracerebral injection of MION 26

Preclinical studies (rats)
direct inoculation of MION BBBD with I.A. of MION Toxicity: - no demyelination - no inflammation - no gliosis - no progressive damage
Combidex
- Mean particle size: 29.5 nm
- Monocrystalline iron cores
- Complete, thick dextran coat
- No rapid opsonization
- Long plasma half-life: 25-30 hours
Jung C et al., Magnetic resonance Imaging, Vol 13, No 5, 1995

Purpose
- Combidex as MR contrast agent in intracranial tumors
- Correlation of Combidex MR and Histology
Method
Patients n=15, each with Gd enhancing areas Anaplastic glioma, low grade glioma, GBM, Medulloblastoma, Hamartoma, Meningioma, Pituitary macroadenoma
Combidex administration 2.6 mgFe/kg diluted in 50 ml normal saline, infused at 4 ml/min
MR imaging with Gd <28 days with Combidex 6 h and 24 h SE T1, fast SE T2, GRE T2*
Results Progressive signal change with Combidex (oligo. III)

Várallyay et al. American Journal of Neuroradiology 23:510-519, 2002.
Combidex Signal Change versus Gadolinium Enhancement n=15
- 13 different types of tumor -> Combidex +
Anaplastic glioma, GBM, Medulloblastoma, Hamartoma, Meningioma, Pituitary macroadenoma
- 3 / 13 additional Combidex enh. areas
- 2 low grade gliomas -> Combidex -
Combidex can be used in imaging brain tumors with the following differences:
- + Gd / - Combidex
- - Gd / +Combidex
- + Gd / + Combidex but less intense
- + Gd / + Combidex but more intense
+Gd / + Combidex- Gd / + Combidex in the middle (oligo. III.)

+Gd / + Combidex (GBM)

+ Gd / - Combidex (oligo. II.)

+ Gd / + Combidex with more and less intense areas (meningioma after rad. Tx)

+Gd / + Combidex but less intense (hypophysis macroadenoma)

+ Gd / + Combidex (less intense tumoral) - Gd / + Combidex (BAT)

Possible explanation for + Gd / - or less Combidex
- Larger Combidex particles are unable to cross the incompetent BBB that is leaky for Gd
- Amount of cells capable of accumulating the iron particles
- Metabolic activity
Possible explanation for- Gd / + Combidex
- Long plasma half life
- Accumulation mechanism exists for Combidex but not for Gd
- Separate mechanism to cross the BBB
- Diffusion, convection, intracellular transport
Perl`s stain iron staining at the tumor (T) / reactive brain (RB) interface

Perl`s stain Iron staining at the tumor (T) / reactive brain interface

Conclusion
- Combidex can be used in brain tumor imaging
- Accumulation is primarily at the tumor-brain interface
- MR can be compared with histology showing cellular location of iron
Purpose
- Evaluate Combidex in assessing residual tumor
Background
- Surgically induced intra- and postop "benign" Gd enhancement.
- Early: contrast leakage, luxury perfusion, BBB damage
- Late: granulation tissue
- Long lasting enhancement with Combidex
Method
- n=7 with malignant tumor (anaplastic glioma, GBM, Metastasis)
- Gd-enhanced MR (<28 days)
- Preop. Combidex-enhanced MR
- (24 h after Combidex infusion; surgery within four hours)
- Postop. Combidex-enhanced MR (at an average of 22 h after preop. MR, average 18 h after surgery
Results Comparison of Combidex versus Gadolinium on pre- and postop. MR
- Preop. MR
- n=7 each tumor with Gd and Combidex enhancement
- 5 / 7 additional Combidex enhancing area
- Postop. MR
- 4 / 7 residual Combidex enhancement
- 3 / 7 indeterminate for residual Combidex
Várallyay et al. ASNR/poster/2003
Reason for 3 / 7 indeterminate cases
Hemostasis materials (H2O2, Surgicel) early, rapid oxidation of oxihemoglobin
methemoglobin
Spiller et al. Journal of Neurosurgery 95:687-693, 2001.
GBM, new lesion

GBM, postop residual Combidex or blood ?

GBM, postop residual Combidex or blood ?

GBM, postop residual Combidex area

GBM, new lesion = new tumor foci ?

GBM, intraop. 0.15 T Odin scanner

Conclusion / 1
- Combidex may show additional enhancing areas near or even at a distance from the Gd-enhancing tumor
- Residual Combidex-enhancing areas identified at about 2 days after Combidex inf., 1 day after surgery
- Potential to assess residual tumor without re-administaring a contrast during postop. MR
Conclusion / 2
- Single dose contrast agent for pre-, intra- and postop. MR
- Intraop. hemostasis, which result in MR signal change different than Combidex may be needed.
|